|
1 | 2
YET THE NELSON QUOTE SUGGESTS that the insights we might draw from climbing a hundred different mountains may be more limited than we may imagine. Probably, well come back with lots of great photos, entertaining stories, worn-out shoes and some colorful trinkets for the kids (My Parents Went to the Mountains of Instead and all I Got Was This Lousy T-shirt). William Blake sounds like he is referring to the second realm -- the boring, daily round of our daily life -- but actually he is talking about the hazards both of these realms pose when we allow ourselves to be dulled by them: The bounded is loathed by its possessor. The same dull round, even of a universe, would soon become a mill with complicated wheels. HOW, THEN, DO WE UNBIND OURSELVES? We might start by trying to wake up to the mountain on which we live instead of disparaging our daily trip up the mountainside we call home. We might learn more -- Richard Nelson suggests -- by seeing that there is a whole lot going on upon our mountain. A hundred trips up the same mountain -- a hundred times a hundred trips -- is a great opportunity to learn one mountains ecosystem intimately. THE BUDDHA, AS HE OFTEN DID, nailed this whole matter 2,500 years ago. A hundred mountains? A hundred years? Just as there may may be much more to learn right in your own backyard than by heading off in a hundred different directions, the Buddha taught that it is better to live one day awake then a full hundred years in a stupor. As he put in in the chapter titled The Thousands from The Dhammapada, his collected short sayings: Better it is to live one day wise and meditative than to live a hundred years foolish and uncontrolled.
THE ABOVE EXCERPT comes from one of the most melliflously worded translations of "The Dhammapada," by Venerable Acharya Buddharakkhita. His translation of the entire work can be found at one of my favorite Buddhist websites (because of its clean, user-friendly design) at: www.cstone.net/~maxwell/home.htm
LONGTIME HUNDRED MOUNTAIN READERS may have wondered what the heck happened to the Spring 2001 issue of this magazine, since it is jumping straight from the Winter 2001 edition to Summer 2001. This is a quarterly journal, correct? Well, um, in theory. Except that I got overwhelmed this past Spring trying to roll up the side of my mountain more than one rock. In the avalanche that followed, I got flattened. I am just now recovered. But when I awoke from the concussion of the landslide, Spring had passed. So I just went straight to the Summer issue. I'm trying to take some pointers from Sid: only one rock at a time. Be well. Douglas Imbrogno
PREVIOUSLY: Editor's Note., Winter 2001: Editor's Note, Fall 2000: Editor's Note, 3/00: Editor's Note, 12/99: Editor's Note, 5/99: Editor's Note, 2/99: Editor's Note, 11/98:
|